Monday, May 23, 2011

Liza Veysikh in-class revision

The second essay (The Qualitative Paper) I need to work on the most. I provide a lot of good, relevant information on the interviews that I conducted, but it appears to be that the analysis section was very similar to my results section because I haven’t described how the water conservation programs and projects really have helped or haven’t helped water conservation in Colorado. I also probably need to analyze how, what I have found in the interviews, led to an overall conclusion on water conservation in Colorado. This was the main critique of my paper: that it is important to see larger trends behind my interviews. To be able to make my analysis more effective, I think the goal of my paper needs to change somewhat. That is, in my thesis I need to include a broader perspective on my topic and a section concerning water conservation initiatives. I have to draw more connections to the results section and provide a better conclusion section that will provide further implications.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.